JARVIS RAMON HAYNES, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
No. SC07-123
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
November 8, 2007, Decided
PRIOR HISTORY:Â Â Â [*1]
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – Direct Conflict of Decisions. (Orange County). Fifth District – Case No. 5D06-458.
Haynes v. State, 944 So. 2d 417, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 5th Dist., 2006)
COUNSEL:Â Â Terrence E. Kehoe, Orlando, Florida, for Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, Mary G. Jolley and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
JUDGES:Â Â LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
OPINIONÂ Â
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the opinion of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Haynes v. State, 944 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), based on express and direct conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted, and we hereby dismiss review.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.