F.B. v. State

F.B., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Case No. 2D06-4837

COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT

December 5, 2007, Opinion Filed

NOTICE:  

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

PRIOR HISTORY:    [*1]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Walter Schafer, Jr., Judge.

COUNSEL:   James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

JUDGES:   CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

OPINION  

PER CURIAM.

F.B. appeals the trial court’s finding of guilt for felony battery and argues that the State failed to prove the elements of the crime. We affirm because the error was not preserved.

In a juvenile proceeding, a motion for judgment of dismissal at the conclusion of the State’s case is necessary to preserve the issue for review. See Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.525(h); J.D. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 825 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). F.B.’s counsel moved for judgment of dismissal at the close of the State’s case, but not on grounds that the State failed to prove the elements of the crime.

Accordingly, we must affirm.

CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Close
E-mail It